| Global
Insight Perspective |
|
|
| Significance |
Kazakh
President Nursultan Nazarbayev has enjoyed another overwhelming victory over the
opposition in the country's presidential elections, resulting in the Central
Asian strongman securing a third seven-year term in office. |
| Implications |
While
there were indications that Nazarbayev himself was happy to grant the opposition
greater freedoms during the election campaign, the election failed to meet
international standards, with Nazarbayev enjoying total media dominance, while
opposition candidates were subjected to crude attacks by the ruling party
activists in the regions. |
| Outlook |
The
nature of the result is actually something of a setback for Nazarbayev as it is
a blow to his ambitions to chair the Organization for Security and Cooperation
in Europe (OSCE) in 2009. Nazarbayev may be willing to implement a number of
reforms in the short term, but the pace of political reform and cadre change
will remain, at the very best, leisurely. |
Fourteen Years and Still Counting
In his first press conference since
Kazakhstan's Central Election Commission (CEC) confirmed that he had won a
landslide victory in yesterday's (4 December) president elections, incumbent
leader Nursultan Nazarbayev promised to dedicate his seven-year term to
accelerating political reform in the country. Official results from the CEC give
President Nazarbayev some 91.01% of the vote, an overwhelming victory, meaning
that according to the constitution, having led the country since independence in
1991, Nazarbayev will have governed the country for 21 years before he is
subject to another challenge. With the opposition fragmented and divided
following a major split within the Ak Zhol (Bright Path) party earlier this
year, and enjoying control over vast administrative resources which were
mobilised for his election campaign, Nazarbayev was always assured of an easy
victory.
|
Kazakhstan
Presidential Elections, 4 December 2005, Turnout 77% (source: CEC)
|
| Candidate |
% of vote
|
| Nursultan
Nazarbayev (Otan) |
91.01 |
| Zharmakhan
Tuyakbai, ('For a Fair Kazakhstan' Bloc) |
6.64 |
| Alikhan
Baimenov, (Ak Zhol) |
1.65 |
| Erasyl
Abylkasymov (Communist People's Party of Kazakhstan) |
0.38 |
| Mels
Eleusizov (Tabighat) |
0.32 |
Indeed, so assured was Nazarbayev of victory,
that midway through the election campaign he had begun to urge the authorities
in the regions to refrain from their attacks on the opposition, preferring to
woo the electorate by focusing on the stability that his stewardship of the
country has brought the country. Following a nuanced foreign policy, balancing
Kazakhstan's interests with those of the United States, Russia and China,
Nazarbayev has skilfully managed to exploit the country's oil wealth,
transforming the economy from a situation where its own national interests in
controlling the development of its natural resources were subject to foreign
interests, to the point where Kazakhstan has recently joined the elite club of
being a 1 million barrel/day producer and exporter, supplying the United States
and Europe via the recently opened Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline on the one
hand while continuing to expand its energy ties with China on the other,
recently giving the green light to China National Petroleum Corp.'s (CNPC)
US$4.18-billion takeover of PetroKazakhstan, the Canadian-owned oil company
which has all of its operations in Kazakhstan. With GDP growth rates surpassing
9% over the past three years - which Global Insight forecasts will remain at
8.9% for the next two years, before slipping back marginally to 8.8% in 2008 -
President Nazarbayev has focused on the country's booming economy in an effort
to generate public support, pledging to double average monthly income by 2012 to
around US$522, declaring that the state will guarantee similar increases for
pensioners and students.
A result opinion poll suggested that he enjoyed
support in the region of 70-80% for the vast majority of the election campaign,
but the overwhelming nature of the victory has left Nazarbayev open to
accusations of electoral fraud (see Kazakhstan: 2 December 2005: Election
2005: President Set for Landslide in Kazakh Election as Opponents Fail to Make
Impact). Aidos Sarimov, spokesperson for main opposition candidate
Zharmakhan Tuyakbai, a former ally of Nazarbayev claimed that 'there were
multiple violations of the law', telling reporters that the opposition intended
to 'use all potential, possible legal mechanisms to protest these violations'.
The international monitors from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe (OSCE), who have never delivered a favourable verdict on any election in
Kazakhstan, concur with the opposition and have already slammed the conduct of
the election in their preliminary statement into the election. While the OSCE
said that some administrative improvements were made when compared with previous
elections, 'undue restrictions on campaigning, harassment of campaign staff and
persistent and numerous cases of intimidation by the authorities, limited the
possibility for a meaningful competition'.
Outlook and Implications
As the emerging world oil power, seeking to
catapult itself into the top five world oil producers with a goal of 3.5 million
barrels a day in output by 2015, Russia, China and the United States are keen to
promote stability in the Central Asian country. Following the upheavals of the
so-called 'coloured revolutions' in Georgia, Ukraine, and Kyrgyzstan over the
past two years, the United States has recently retreated from its policy of
democratisation in the region as President Nazarbayev displayed signs that if
the U.S. administration were to continue openly pressurising the Kazakh
government to promote democratic reform, then Kazakhstan would move firmly into
Russia and China's orbit. In a visit to Kazakhstan in October 2005, U.S.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice signalled that the United States had no
intention of undermining the current regime.
Nevertheless, the result and the OSCE's
condemnation is something of an embarrassment to Nazarbayev. The Kazakh
president regards himself as a benign dictator, similar to the enlightened
despots of 18th century Europe, and is not keen to be associated with the
excesses of his neighbours in Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. While Nazarbayev has
essentially rejected the notion that economic development and liberalisation
must run parallel with the pursuance of democracy, there is nothing to suggest
that he is against implementing gradual political reform and accelerating the
pace of cadre change when economic conditions dictate confronting endemic
corruption. This endemic corruption not only eventually threatens to hamper the
country's economic development, but also will undermine the political stability
of the country, especially if the country's emerging entrepreneurial classes
come to believe that they would be better off if they removed Nazarbayev and the
ruling clan. While Nazarbayev himself may have wanted a 'fair and free election'
which he would have undoubtedly won, local election officials, keen to
demonstrate their loyalty to the regime, have severely undermined Nazarbayev's
hopes of chairing the OSCE in 2009, which would have been a major symbolic
victory for Nazarbayev in his attempts to showcase Kazakhstan as an emerging
economic and democratic force.
Having pledged to uphold his promise to promote
political reform, the next litmus test for President Nazarbayev will be whether
he is willing to change his team around and promote some younger, more
reform-minded individuals from the government. There has been speculation that
he may be willing at some point to promote some figures from his daughter's Asar
party, which was specifically established to appeal to the younger,
entrepreneurial classes as well as lower income families. The poor result for
the opposition have given them little leverage to press Nazarbayev, so it is
left to the international community to cajole the Kazakh president.
| |